|
|
|
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man of a good fortune must be in want of a wife. |
| BASED ON: "Pride And Prejudice" by Jane Austen |
| FILMING: June to October 1994 |
|
RELEASED: UK - 24 September 1995 USA - 14 January 1996 Australia - 2 March 1996 Netherlands - 3 September 1996 |
|
RUN TIME: UK - 327 Minutes US - 300 Minutes |
AKA: Buszkeseg es balitelet
-
Hungary |
|
FILMING LOCATIONS: Belton House, Grantham,
Lincolnshire, England, UK (Rosings) |
|
| DIRECTOR: Simon Langton | WRITER: Andrew Davies |
| PRODUCER: Sue Birtwistle, Julie Scott, Michael Wearing | CINEMATOGRAPHER: John Kenway |
|
Cast - in credits order
Roger Barclay
... Capt. Carter |
Production Companies
Technical Specifications |
|
MUSIC:
1. Pride and Prejudice |
|
REVIEWS
|
I don't know how to improve on perfection, do you? The perfect cast, the perfect locales, the perfection of the costuming, cinematography, score and adaptation of a classic. This novel has been filmed repeatedly over the decades and all fell short. They got the characters wrong, or they were either too stiff or too informal in the presentation. The costuming was always horrible and excuse me, but they always got Darcy wrong, wrong, wrong. Okay, so maybe I'm biased, but I do believe the gentleman was described as handsome. This was strike one in every other production until Colin Firth took it on. Well, maybe Laurence Olivier wasn't so bad looking in his turn, but the movie was a dud. Too much left out and the script otherwise was too short. This is not a novel to be adapted for the big screen unless you want to do the whole thing. You can't water it down, it loses too much. This leaves me to want to ask Working Title Films what the hell they are doing. Even in two or three hours, it isn't going to work. (Casting aside, which is basically appalling anyway.) I first read this novel at the age of fourteen (back before the earth's crust cooled) and was taken in by the character of Darcy. I seemed to see the storyline from his point of view, never Elizabeth's; even if she was telling the story. That is to say, it's her story. I always felt Darcy was out-of-place, or felt so in social situations. To this end he put on this 'proud' facade. Well, I never saw a production done so, nor any actor take the role on from that point of view. I would have to go back and re-read the novel, though I always came away with the same feelings for the character. I always saw complete arrogance in the film interpretations...until this one. Here was an actor that had gotten it right. Or perhaps we can credit the screenwriters. In any case, Colin Firth played it the only way it ever should have been. I do lean towards a miscast for Wickham. He was supposed to be as handsome or more so? than Darcy. I'm not criticizing Adrian Lukis, he did a superb job in the role, the looks just weren't there. From the creepy Mr. Collins to the pathetic Caroline Bingley to the overbearing Lady Catherine I could never have imagined such a wonderful recitation of this masterpiece. The characters were true to their inventor and to the tome itself. The story unfolded and flowed elegantly across my television screen for all six parts, it left you wanting more. My one criticism here was that they cut the ending all too short. The revelations about Darcy to the Bennet's; the dinners where Lizzy and Darcy first, don't know what is going on with each other then have to hide how they feel about one another (for a time) after the second proposal, but you can't have everything. So much has been said; so much has been written on this series I hardly have to go into more detail, so I will leave it here with these final words - Perfection Personified. |
| site index | | movies index | | main page | | contact us | | forum | | chat room | | photo gallery |